upstart (Стоит ли менять стандартый init на него?)
Модератор: Модераторы разделов
-
PolecatZZZ
- Сообщения: 258
- ОС: Debian 6
upstart
Задался таким вот вопросом... На сколько он "лучше" чем init? И появиться ли в скором времени upstart в стандартной поставке или стоит чуть-чуть повозиться сейчас самому?
OpenSUSE >>> Debian
-
k0da
- Бывший модератор
- Сообщения: 6043
- Статус: SuSE QA Engineer
- ОС: Factory
Re: upstart
PolecatZZZ
В Factory есть. Насколько лучше решать вам
В Factory есть. Насколько лучше решать вам
Fury in my eyes, sword on my side
Afro on my head, I'm a black Samurai
Number One, I bring my whole nation alive
Escape death, to become immortalized
Afro on my head, I'm a black Samurai
Number One, I bring my whole nation alive
Escape death, to become immortalized
-
k0da
- Бывший модератор
- Сообщения: 6043
- Статус: SuSE QA Engineer
- ОС: Factory
Re: upstart
Hi,
I made upstart an optional replacement for sysvinit to
a) test if it works good enough
b) prove that it has no influence on the boot time
b) is done and a) is kind of done.
It works, and it only sometimes shows problems - that I have
no time to debug as debugging it involves rebooting and it's
about impossible to debug other people's machines reboot remotely.
Additionally to that, upstart takes more memory than sysvinit's
init and it makes it harder for people to adminstrate 11.3 and older
systems in parallel. If upstart was the obvious future, I wouldn't
care too much - but systemd[1] at least opens doubts that this will be
the case.
So I would to reduce the feature to "provide upstart" and set it to done
and change the patterns back to sysvinit. Oppinions? If someone really wants
upstart badly, he has to provide a patch as a reply to comment#38 in the
feature though
I made upstart an optional replacement for sysvinit to
a) test if it works good enough
b) prove that it has no influence on the boot time
b) is done and a) is kind of done.
It works, and it only sometimes shows problems - that I have
no time to debug as debugging it involves rebooting and it's
about impossible to debug other people's machines reboot remotely.
Additionally to that, upstart takes more memory than sysvinit's
init and it makes it harder for people to adminstrate 11.3 and older
systems in parallel. If upstart was the obvious future, I wouldn't
care too much - but systemd[1] at least opens doubts that this will be
the case.
So I would to reduce the feature to "provide upstart" and set it to done
and change the patterns back to sysvinit. Oppinions? If someone really wants
upstart badly, he has to provide a patch as a reply to comment#38 in the
feature though
Fury in my eyes, sword on my side
Afro on my head, I'm a black Samurai
Number One, I bring my whole nation alive
Escape death, to become immortalized
Afro on my head, I'm a black Samurai
Number One, I bring my whole nation alive
Escape death, to become immortalized